MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395468706 · doi:10.1016/j.jposna.2024.100064

The evolving role and technique of hip arthroscopy in children and adolescents

2024· review· en· W4395468706 on OpenAlexaff
Shalin Shah, Tyler J. Stavinoha, Jeffrey J. Nepple, Allison Crepeau, Sasha Carsen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHip arthroscopyMedicinePsychologyArthroscopyPhysical therapySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hip Arthroscopy in the pediatric and adolescent hip has evolved from its role as a diagnostic tool to a primary modality of management of variety of hip pathologies in children and adolescents. This article reviews current concepts and advances in hip arthroscopy in this population. We discuss the indications, techniques, outcomes, and complications of hip arthroscopy in children and adolescents. We explore the newer indications of hip arthroscopy in the treatment of SCFE (Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis) deformity correction, borderline hip dysplasia, septic arthritis, infantile developmental dysplasia, Perthes disease, and the existing and developing evidence. Finally, we address the challenges and future directions in research, education, and training, unique to the pediatric and adolescent population. Key Concepts: (1)Hip arthroscopy has significant surgical applications in the pediatric and adolescent population, and can be used to help address several intra-articular as well as extra-articular pathologies.(2)The indications and potential for arthroscopic interventions and associated arthroscopic techniques is growing and developing rapidly, along with improving technology, techniques, and training.(3)FAI (Femoro Acetabular Impingement) and labral pathology are the most common indications for surgery in the adolescent, and clinical outcome studies show excellent results. However, nonoperative optimization should be strongly emphasized before surgical consideration.(4)Hip arthroscopy is minimally invasive and relatively low risk, though main risks and complications to be aware of is the potential need for revision or further surgery, transient neuropraxia of the pudendal nerve, surgical site infection, implant/tool-related breakage or failure, failed surgery, and venous thromboembolism.(5)Continued research and innovation in the field of pediatric hip arthroscopy are essential for further improving outcomes and expanding treatment options for young patients with hip disorders, and more pediatric-specific clinical research is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North AmericaSame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207