MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395468816 · doi:10.4000/genesis.8952

Les archives de production du film d’animation Ma vie de Courgette

2024· article· fr· W4395468816 on OpenAlexaff
Chloé Hofmann

Bibliographic record

VenueGenesis · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dévoilé pour la première fois lors de la Quinzaine des réalisateurs du festival de Cannes en 2016 et nominé pour les Oscars dans la catégorie « Meilleur film d'animation » en 2017, Ma vie de Courgette -réalisé par le Valaisan Claude Barras et scénarisé par la Française Céline Sciamma 1 -est un long-métrage d'animation en volume coproduit par Rita Productions (Suisse), Blue Spirit (France), Gebeka Films (France) et KNM (Monaco).Adapté du roman Autobiographie d'une Courgette de Gilles Paris publié chez Plon en 2002, le film met en scène Icare, alias Courgette, un petit garçon de neuf ans, qui vit dans un foyer avec d'autres enfants depuis qu'il a accidentellement tué sa mère.Tourné à Villeurbanne, dans la banlieue lyonnaise, le film est considéré comme l'un des premiers longs-métrages d'animation helvétiques, et a connu un important succès public, puisque plus d'un million d'entrées ont été comptabilisées à ce jour pour la France seulement 2 .Il a par ailleurs obtenu un accueil critique majoritairement positif, les journalistes ayant salué son inventivité et sa finesse 3 .Les archives de production du film d'animation Ma vie de Courgette Genesis, 57 | 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0120.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0950.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenesisSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207