MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395668620 · doi:10.26656/fr.2017.8(2).150

Modification of the GLITEROS diabetes-specific hospital enteral formula basedon jicama flour and tempeh flour with the addition of sunflower seed flour

2024· article· en· W4395668620 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFood Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas Diponegoro
KeywordsWheat flourSunflowerFood scienceMathematicsMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The diabetes-specific enteral formula is necessary to assist glycemic control for critically ill diabetic patients. The GLITEROS enteral formula is an innovative diabetes-specific hospital enteral formula made from local food, jicama flour and tempeh flour. However, the fat content in the GLITEROS enteral formula does not meet the fat requirements for a diabetes-specific enteral formula. Sunflower seeds are a good food source of monounsaturated fatty acids, specifically oleic acid which has antidiabetic effects. The addition of sunflower seeds to the GLITEROS enteral formula as a modification can optimize the lack of fat content. This study aimed to analyze the macronutrient content, dietary fiber, protein digestibility, and physical properties, including viscosity and osmolality of the modified GLITEROS enteral formula. This research was an experimental study with four formula groups, Formula A, B, C, and D, with different ratios of tempeh flour, jicama flour, and sunflower seed flour; (1:1:1), (1:1:2), (1:2:1), and (2:1:1). The variables of this study were energy density, calories, carbohydrates, fat, protein, dietary fiber, protein digestibility, viscosity, and osmolality were tested with three repetitions in duplicate. Data analysis used One-way ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Formula B had the highest density of energy, energy, fat, and dietary fiber compared to the four formulas. Meanwhile, Formula C had the highest protein content and digestibility value compared to other formulas. The highest viscosity and osmolality values were in formula A. Formula C was the most qualified formula in terms of macronutrient content, dietary fiber, protein digestibility, and physical properties of diabetes-specific enteral formulas according to the requirements of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA), American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it