MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395677038 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4292456/v1

Rifampin-resistant periprosthetic joint infections are associated with worse functional outcome in both acute and chronic infection types

2024· preprint· en· W4395677038 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tobias Baumgärtner, Mohamad Bdeir, Franz‐Joseph Dally, Sascha Gravius, Asseel Abd El Hai, Elio Assaf, Svetlana Hetjens, Thomas Miethke, Ali Darwich

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriprostheticJoint infectionsMedicineInternal medicineOutcome (game theory)Intensive care medicineArthroplastySurgeryEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) pose a significant challenge in orthopaedic surgery, often requiring extensive surgical debridement and prolonged antibiotic treatment to eliminate the causative pathogens. Rifampin, known for its potent activity against biofilms, has been crucial in managing PJI by penetrating and disrupting these formations, thereby improving treatment efficacy. In this sense, antibiotic protocols lacking rifampin have shown increased failure rates. Consequently, the development of rifampin resistance could severely influence the prognosis of PJI. The aim of this clinical study was to assess how rifampin resistance affects the functional outcome in patients with PJI. In this single-centre comparative cohort study, we systematically documented all patients who presented with a PJI during the period spanning from 2018 to 2020. Two distinct groups were established for the study: Group 1 comprised 35 patients with a PJI caused by rifampin-susceptible pathogens and group 2 consisted of 28 patients with PJI caused by rifampin-resistant pathogens. A total of 63 patients (34 females) with a mean age of 68 years and a mean follow up of 37 months were included. The examination of patient-specific parameters did not reveal any identified risk factors as influential. Patients with a rifampin-resistant pathogen underwent a greater number of surgical revisions (6.9 ± 5.1 compared to 3.59 ± 3.39, p = 0.0011) and had extended durations of antibiotic treatment (p = 0.0052). The results of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score revealed significant differences in clinical outcome between both groups in every domain, even when stratified by acute and chronic entities. In total the WOMAC increased significantly from 21.57 ± 14.9 points in group 1 to 71.47 ± 62.7 points in group 2 (p < 0.001). The higher failure rates observed in group 2 were not statistically significant (p = 0.44). The current study demonstrates that PJI caused by rifampin-resistant bacteria are associated with a significantly worse functional outcome in both acute and chronic infection types without significantly affecting total failure rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicOrthopedic Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207