Quand le cheval paraît : représentations et fonctions diégétiques de la figure équine dans le roman contemporain français (1933-2016)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Horses are the vectors of multiple representations related to their specific abilities and properties. These have endowed it, especially in the mythical narrative, with an image in turn positive (magic horses, divine, solar) or negative (horses of nightmare, infernal, psychopumps).</p><p>By examining a varied corpus of French short stories and novels published between 1933 and 2016 (Paul Morand, Jean Giono, Claude Simon, Richard Millet, Laurent Mauvignier), we will focus on the peculiarities of equine figures in contemporary french fiction, their functions in the story and their places in the construction of the narrative.</p><p>The appearance of the horse in the novel also allows us to question the notion of scene and to define the «equestrian scene», returning to the definitions and the means of analysis given by Gérard Genette (Figures III), or Stéphane Lojkine (La Scène de roman). This theoretical journey allows us to question the existence of a horse-type, in the Balzacian sense, an autonomous and characteristic figure that can be found in the various stories through the equestrian scenes. The analysis of these scenes, which presuppose an interaction between the horse and the other characters, will lead us to answer the question of how the presence of horses allows the dramatization of the story.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".