MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396213716 · doi:10.1097/icb.0000000000001589

EVOLUTION OF PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM MACULOPATHY FOLLOWING MEDICATION DISCONTINUATION

2024· article· en· W4396213716 on OpenAlexaff
Brendan Tao, Austin Pereira, Keyvan Koushan

Bibliographic record

VenueRetinal Cases & Brief Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscontinuationMedicineMaculopathyInternal medicineOphthalmologyEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitusRetinopathy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To describe a patient receiving pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS) for interstitial cystitis, who developed PPS maculopathy that persisted and evolved for 4 years after medication discontinuation. Methods: Case report of one patient at a tertiary retina clinic. Results: A 48-year-old woman with a history of interstitial cystitis was referred to our retina clinic with no vision complaints. She had been taking PPS for 10 years, first consuming 600 mg/day for 8 years, followed by 200 mg/day for 2 years. At the first presentation in 2016, examination revealed macular pigmentary clumping in both eyes. In subsequent years, pigmentary changes were confirmed by optical coherence tomography, which showed progressive macular thinning in both eyes. In 2019, the patient discontinued PPS; however, she continued to exhibit pentosan polysulfate sodium maculopathy progression for years thereafter. At 4-year follow-up after discontinuation of PPS, the patient returned with stable vision but showed changes in macular lipofuscin deposits with outer retinal and retinal pigment epithelial alterations. Conclusion: This case demonstrates sustained and evolving pentosan polysulfate sodium maculopathy even after drug discontinuation, suggesting that active PPS may have a prolonged half-life in the retina and retinal pigment epithelium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRetinal Cases & Brief ReportsSame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207