Introduction: The Law of Labour—Evaluating the Labour Law Reforms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction This book argues that the 2020 labour law reforms in India, where Parliament consolidated twenty-nine federal statutes into four labour codes, fail to meet the Indian Constitution's labour mandate. In so failing to meet the constitutional mandate, the reforms have far-reaching consequences for labour rights in the country. Labour, understood broadly as an individual's personal undertaking contributing to broader socio-economic pursuits, occupies a prominent position in the constitutional framework in India. As a category, labour is pivotal to the social justice agenda envisaged under the Constitution. The Preamble to the Constitution of India, 1950, aspires to social, economic and political justice. The other values fundamental to the foundation of the republic are freedom, equality and solidarity. While the latter values are inherently important for the constitutional framework of the nation, they are also the conceptual and programmatic components of the constitutional social justice agenda. On the basis of its social justice agenda, India's Constitution could be positioned somewhere between classical liberalism and social democracy. In classical liberalism, on the one hand, the constitution stipulates basic rules of contract, property and tort to regulate market exchanges, which are the primary means of distributing goods and services. In social democracy, on the other hand, the constitution catalogues extensive rules of redistribution that secure citizens’ legal entitlements, such as education, nutrition, work, healthcare, social security, unionisation, maternity benefit, legal aid, and so on. Mark Tushnet notes that in classical liberalism, the distribution of goods and the principles of such distribution are primarily the concern of private law, whereas in social democracy, they are primarily a public law issue. The Indian Constitution uses – balances – both of these approaches by simultaneously allocating a role for the market (structured through private law) and guaranteeing welfare rights (secured through public law). The Constitutional Social Justice Agenda The Indian Constitution's social justice agenda is furthered through a combination of individual freedom, social solidarity and participatory democracy. It is the balance among these three aspects of the social justice agenda that captures the uniqueness of the agenda for Indian society. The Constitution guarantees every citizen of India the individual freedom to practise their chosen occupation and engage in a trade or business of their choice without undue interference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".