Enhancing the Biocompatibility of Titanium Implants with Chitosan-Alginate Bio-Composite Coatings Reinforced with HAP and ZnO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current work aims to enhance the biocompatibility and antibacterial properties of titanium implants using chitosan/Na alginate matrix composite as a coating layer reinforced with various ratios of hydroxyapatite (HAP) and ZnO by the Sol-Gel Dip method resulting in a product of exceptional purity, a limited dispersion of particle sizes, and the creation of a homogeneous nanostructure.The coating layer is characterized by FE-SEM for microstructure observation.From the results, it was concluded that the precipitation of a bio-composite coating layer by Sol-Gel Dip was suitable for creating a strong, adherent biocompatible layer of chitosan/alginate with a thickness of about (126.9µm).While the average diameter is approximately (21.5µm).The results showed that the dip-coating deposition method is very suitable for making CS-based composite coatings reinforced with ZnO and HAP.From the anti-bacterial test results, it was found that the addition of ceramic particles (HAP or ZnO) to the microstructure for the coating samples revealed a uniform distribution of all types of the natural polymer coating layer on the implants, indicating a suitable preparation and type of coating process (Sol-Gel Dip Composite Coating), which also enhanced the coating's roughness property and effective at inhibiting bacterial growth.This work revealed the assets of chitosan/Na alginate matrix composites in various percentages, which have not been tried up to now and could be very important for the development of the biomedical field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".