MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4396494567 · doi:10.18280/ts.410222

Differential Cortical Connectivity in Migraine: Insights from High-Density EEG and Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials

2024· article· en· W4396494567 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Msallam Abbas Abdulhussein, Ali W. Aldeen, Hamid Al-Abboodi

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMigraine and Headache Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyAuraAudiologyInterstimulus intervalMigraineMigraine with auraPsychologyIctalPhotic StimulationNeuroscienceStimulationVisual perceptionMedicinePerceptionPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This investigation explores cortical connectivity in individuals diagnosed with migraine, employing high-density electroencephalography (HD-EEG) and steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) to discern distinctions between migraine with aura (MWA) and migraine without aura (MWoA).The cohort comprised 22 participants suffering from migraines, categorized into MWA (13 participants, including 7 females) and MWoA (9 participants, with 5 females), alongside a control group of 19 healthy individuals (8 females), exhibiting no history of migraines.The ages of the migraine and control groups were 29±1 and 27±1 years, respectively.The methodology involved exposing subjects to visual stimuli at frequencies of four Hz and six Hz, each for a duration of 2 seconds, interspersed with interstimulus intervals of 1 to 1.5 seconds.The frequencies were presented in a randomized sequence, with each being delivered 100 times.Through the acquisition of EEG data from 128 custom electrode positions, inter-and intra-hemispheric coherence during the interictal phase was meticulously analyzed.It was observed that individuals with migraines exhibited a pronounced reduction in alpha-wave pattern uniformity across both intra-and interhemispheric connections, a phenomenon markedly accentuated in the MWA group.Further, a unique functional connectivity metric derived from HD-EEG data during repeated SSVEP stimulation emerged as a potential biomarker capable of differentiating between MWA and MWoA subjects.Notably, a significant discrepancy in the slope between Block 1 and Block 6 was observed in MWA subjects, highlighting a distinct response irrespective of stimulation frequency.These findings underscore the clinical significance of cortical connectivity measures in understanding migraine pathophysiology and developing targeted treatments.The variation in alpha-band coherence could reflect differential sensory processing and neural communication mechanisms, potentially linked to Cortical Spreading Depression (CSD).Despite the promising insights, the limited sample size underscores the need for cautious interpretation of the results and further research.This study contributes to the body of knowledge on migraine-induced alterations in brain function, paving the way for refined diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signal→Same topicMigraine and Headache Studies→French-language works237,207→