Level of glial cell derived neurotrophic factor in the blood plasma of rheumatoid arthritis patients and its relationship with alexithymia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives Glial cell derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has an important role in the pathogenetic mechanisms and clinical manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Alexithymia is associated with a severe clinical course and worse prognosis, while the relationship between alexithymia and GDNF in RA patients has not been investigated before. The aims of the study were to investigate the GDNF level in blood plasma in RA patients depending on the presence of alexithymia and to evaluate the relationship of GDNF level with clinical manifestation and quality of life. Material and methods Fifteen men and 73 women with RA were examined using the Disease Activity Score with 28-joint count (DAS28) with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) index, the Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI), the Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), the Visual Analogue Scale (according to the assessment of the patient – VAS-P and the assessment of the doctor – VAS-D), the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), the Disability Rating Index (DRI) and SF-36 indexes. Glial cell derived neurotrophic factor level in the blood plasma was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results Forty percent of RA patients had alexithymia. Glial cell derived neurotrophic factor level in the examined patients was 3.73 ±2.59 pg/ml, in patients with alexithymia 4.08 ±2.87 pg/ml, without alexithymia 3.48 ±2.37 pg/ml (p = 0.295). Patients with alexithymia had a higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and index scores than patients without alexithymia – ESR: 34.29 ±14.22 vs. 22.73 ±12.03 mm/h (p = 0.017), DAS28: 6.53 ±0.66 vs. 6.09 ±0.55 (p = 0.017), VAS-D: 7.19 ±0.81 vs. 6.53 ±0.83 (p = 0.020), HAQ: 1.78 ±0.58 vs. 1.51 ±0.54 (p = 0.040). Also they had worse SF-36 indicators – physical functioning: 39.52 ±13.78 vs. 51.00 ±14.90 (p = 0.019), role functioning due to physical condition: 30.95 ±20.77 vs. 46.67 ±24.76 (p = 0.041), physical component of health: 31.47 ±11.44 vs. 41.61 ±15.88 (p = 0.028). In patients with alexithymia, a correlation was found between the GDNF level and severity of pain according to VAS-P: rS = 0.338, p = 0.044, and VAS-D: rS = 0.446, p = 0.006. Conclusions Alexithymia was found in 40% of RA patients. Rheumatoid arthritis patients with alexithymia had a nonsignificantly higher GDNF level compared to patients without alexithymia. In RA patients with alexithymia, an association of GDNF level in the blood plasma with RA activity, loss of functional capacity and reduced quality of life was established. Alexithymia in RA patients is an important factor in the clinical manifestation of RA and modification of the pathophysiological role of GDNF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".