Bibliographic record
Abstract
Special issue on gender diversity editorial introductionGender, sexual, erotic, and relational diversity (GSERD) is an umbrella term and related conceptualization aimed at more comprehensively and inclusively recognizing the diversity within people than the more historical and popularized conceptualizations of most Westernized societies that exists in terms of sexuality and gender (like lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender +; LGBT+) (Davies & Barker, 2015; Twist, 2016aTwist, , 2018;;Twist et al., 2021).This theoretical conceptualization includes the diversity within and between humans around gender (e.g.cisgender, transgender, agender, genderqueer, nonbinary, etc.), sexuality (e.g.heterosexual, gay, lesbian, asexual, bisexual, pansexual, etc.), eroticism (e.g.kinky, fetishists, non-kinky, etc.), and relationality (e.g.monogamous, monogamish, polyamorous, polygamous, etc.).Over time, Sexual and Relationship Therapy (SRT) has attended to GSERD in a number of ways.In 2018, we published a special issue focused on GSERD (Twist, 2018).In the spring of 2022, the organization that houses the journal, the College of Sexual and Relational Therapists (COSRT), held a conference with the primary focal point being that of gender, sexual, and relationship diversity (GSRD; Davies & Barker, 2015; Twist, 2022).And since implementing the journal's article of the year and honourable mention awards in 2021, every award-winning article has been focused on GSERD and related clinical applications in psychosexual and relationship therapy practices (Twist, 2024).Before our framing through a GSERD lens, there were two separate special issues focused on two different areas within this larger GSERD umbrella.The first was focused on gender variance and transgender identity (Bockting, 2009) and the second was focused on bisexuality and related relationships (Vencill & Israel, 2018).The framing of this former special issue on gender was through the lens of gender diversity at the exclusion of cisgender genders, which differs from the GSERD view of gender, which is one that is inclusive of all genders, including cisgender genders.The framing of bisexuality was on that specific sexual orientation, which is again different than the framing of sexuality/sexuality orientation through a GSERD lens, which is on all sexualities/sexual orientations, including non-queer ones like heterosexuality.So, in the spirit of our historical and ongoing GSERD focus, we are putting forth this special issue focused on just one of the areas of diversity under the GSERD umbrella and that is gender diversity.In addition, we would like to take a moment to formally announce one more upcoming GSERD-related journal opportunity and that is our call for a special issue on contemporary queer youth by Guest Editor,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.068 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".