MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396498135 · doi:10.47489/szmc.v38i2.462

Antinociceptive Evaluation of Antidepressants (Cita- lopram, Duloxetine and Amitriptyline) in a Mouse Model of Acute Pain

2024· article· en· W4396498135 on OpenAlexaff
Sidra Shah, Mudassara Saqib, Azka Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex Lahore · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsContinental (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuloxetineAmitriptylineNociceptionMedicinePharmacologyPsychologyInternal medicineReceptorAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Acute pain is a pervasive and debilitating symptom affecting the general population as well as depressed patients who suffer even more from pain and fatigue. Aims and Objectives: To evaluate the antinociceptive effect induced by antidepressants (Citalopram, Duloxetine and Amitriptyline) in acute pain induced in mice. Place and Duration of study: Animal Research Laboratory of University of Lahore. Study Period: 2018- 2019 Material and Methods: An experimental animal study was carried out on 25 albino mice. The mice were divided into 5 groups; Group 1: Positive Control (PC), Group 2: Ibuprofen (IBO) (Standard) 80mg/kg, Group3: Citalopram (CTP)3mg/kg, Group 4: Duloxetine (DXT) 25mg/kg, Group 5: Amitriptyline (AMT) 15mg/kg. Groups 2-5 were administered drugs orally through a feeding tube as per group designation while Group 1: Control was given an equivalent amount of normal saline. One hour post treatment with test drugs, all Groups (1-5) were injected 10 ml/ kg of 2% acetic acid I/P and number of writhing movements consisting of contraction of abdominal muscles leading to extension of hind limb and periodic arching of body as well as paw licking behavior were counted for 20 minutes at 5- minute interval, using hand tally counter. Degree of analgesia was calculated by using formula of percentage effectiveness. Data was entered and analyzed utilizing SPSS version 21, p?0.05 was taken as significant. Results: Ibuprofen completely eliminated the nociceptive outcome of diluted acetic acid in writhing and licking of experimental animals. Citalopram, showed maximum decreasing effect (95%-96%) in writhing in 5-20 min. However, its effect in paw licking was low. Duloxetine showed 70% to 90% decrease in writhing at 5-20 min whereas 100 % inhibition of paw-licking was observed at 5 to 20 minutes. The writhing effect of amitriptyline was 77%-90% at 5-20 min and paw licking effect was 80-90 % at 5-20 min. Conclusion: Amitriptyline, duloxetine and citalopram have significant effect in reducing the acute nociceptive pain and may be utilized as analgesic in acute state of pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex LahoreSame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207