MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial assessing the effects of a driving pressure–limiting strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to community-acquired pneumonia (STAMINA trial): protocol and statistical analysis plan

2024· article· en· W4396506438 on OpenAlexaff
Israel Silva Maia, Fernando Azevedo Medrado, Lucas Tramujas, Bruno Martins Tomazini, Júlia Souza Oliveira, Érica Regina Ribeiro Sady, Letícia Galvão Barbante, Marina Lazzari Nicola, Rodrigo Magalhães Gurgel, Lucas Petri Damiani, Karina Leal Negrelli, Tamiris Abait Miranda, Eliana Vieira Santucci, Nanci Valeis, Ligia Nasi Laranjeira, Glauco Adrieno Westphal, Ruthy Perotto Fernandes, Cássio Luis Zandonai, Mariângela Pimentel Pincelli, Rodrigo Cruvinel Figueiredo, Cíntia Loss Sartori Bustamante, Luiz Fernando Norbin, Emerson Boschi, Rafael Lessa, Marcelo Pereira Romano, Mieko Cláudia Miura, Meton Soares de Alencar Filho, Vicente Cés de Souza-Dantas, Priscilla Alves Barreto, Mauro Esteves Hernandes, Cíntia Magalhães Carvalho Grion, Alexandre Sanches Laranjeira, Ana Luiza Mezzaroba, Marina Bahl, Ana Carolina Starke, Rodrigo Biondi, Felipe Dal‐Pizzol, Eliana Bernadete Caser, Marlus Muri Thompson, Andrea Allegrini Padial, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Rodrigo Thot Leite, Gustavo Araújo, Mário Guimarães, Priscilla de Aquino Martins, Fábio Holanda Lacerda, Conrado Roberto Hoffmann Filho, Lívia Maria Garcia Melro, Eduardo Pacheco, Gustavo A. Ospina‐Tascón, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Fabricio Jocundo Calado Freires, F.S. Machado, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Fernando G. Zampieri

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health Services
FundersMinistério da Saúde
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialAcute respiratory distressPneumoniaLimitingMedicineIntensive care medicineProtocol (science)Physical therapyDistressEmergency medicineAlternative medicineInternal medicineLungClinical psychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Driving pressure has been suggested to be the main driver of ventilator-induced lung injury and mortality in observational studies of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy can improve clinical outcomes is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To describe the protocol and statistical analysis plan that will be used to test whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy including positive end-expiratory pressure titration according to the best respiratory compliance and reduction in tidal volume is superior to a standard strategy involving the use of the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table in terms of increasing the number of ventilator-free days in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS: The ventilator STrAtegy for coMmunIty acquired pNeumoniA (STAMINA) study is a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial that compares a driving pressure-limiting strategy to the ARDSnet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to community-acquired pneumonia admitted to intensive care units. We expect to recruit 500 patients from 20 Brazilian and 2 Colombian intensive care units. They will be randomized to a driving pressure-limiting strategy group or to a standard strategy using the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table. In the driving pressure-limiting strategy group, positive end-expiratory pressure will be titrated according to the best respiratory system compliance. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days. The secondary outcomes are in-hospital and intensive care unit mortality and the need for rescue therapies such as extracorporeal life support, recruitment maneuvers and inhaled nitric oxide. CONCLUSION: STAMINA is designed to provide evidence on whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy is superior to the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table strategy for increasing the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Here, we describe the rationale, design and status of the trial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.005
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care ScienceSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207