Feeding Patterns And Underweight In Toodler
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Latar Belakang :Underweight merupakan indikator utama kekurangan gizi pada anak dan dapat menimbulkan dampak jangka panjang seperti gangguan kesehatan fisik dan mental, perilaku, dan kognitif .Prevalensi underweight pada anak balita Puskesmas Rowosari II sebesar 9,8 % mayoritas terjadi pada usia 24-60 bulan dengan persentase 0,53%. Permasalahan yang menyebabkan balita mengalami underweight yaitu kurangnya pengetahuan pada orangtua atau pengasuh, kurangnya asupan makanan, dan adanya penyakit infeksi. Penyakit infeksi yang diderita balita dapat mempengaruhi nafsu makan balita sehingga kebutuhan gizi dan makanan dalam tubuh balita tidak terpenuhi akibatnya balita dapat mengalami penurunan berat badan.Tujuan :Untuk mengetahui hubungan Pola pemberian makan dengan underweight pada Balita.Metode :Jenis penelitian ini dengan metode survey dan pendekatan cross sectional. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah seluruh ibu Balita dengan status gizi underweight berjumlah 111, dengan teknik pengambilan sampel secara purposive sampling berjumlah 40 responden. Analisis data dengan uji Rank SpearmanHasil :Dari hasil penelitian didapatkan bahwa 77.5% Balita dengan status gizi underweight, dan sebanyak 22,5 dengan status gizi nornal . Pola pemberian makan tepat sebanyak 17.5, dan pola pemberian tidak tepat sebanyak 82,5%. Dari uji statistik didapatkan nilai p value = 0,050 dengan nilai koefisien korelasi yaitu r = 0,312 sehingga ada hubungan antara pola pemberian makan dengan status gizi balita underweight. Kesimpulan : ada hubungan pola pemberian makan terhadap status gizi underweight pada balita (p value = 0,050)Saran:Diharapkan ibu balita dapat meningkatkan pengetahuan dengan aktif mengikuti kelas Balita, dan rutin ikut serta dalam kegiatan posyandu sehingga dapat mengetahui informasi tentang pemberian makan yang bergizi bagi balita yang berkaitan dengan perbaikan pola asuh kepada anak balita. Kata Kunci : Balita Pola pemberian makan, Underweight ABSTRACT Background: Underweight is the main indicator of malnutrition in children. It causes several long-term impacts such as physical and mental health, behavioral and cognitive disorders. The prevalence of underweight in children under five at the Rowosari II Health Center is 9.8%, the majority occurs at the age of 24-60 months by 0.53%. Problems that cause it are: lack of knowledge among parents or caregivers, lack of food intake, and the presence of infectious diseases. Infectious diseases suffered by toddlers can affect the toddler's appetite so that the nutritional and food needs of the toddler's body are not met, as a result the toddler can experience weight loss.Objective: To determine the relationship between feeding patterns and underweight in toddlers.Method: This type of research uses survey methods and a cross sectional approach. The population of this study was all 111 mothers of toddlers with underweight nutritional status, with a purposive sampling technique of 40 respondents. Data analysis using the Spearman Rank test.Results: From the research results it was found that 77.5% of toddlers had underweight nutritional status, and as many as 22.5 had normal nutritional status. Appropriate feeding patterns were 17.5%, and inappropriate feeding patterns were 82.5%. From statistical tests, it was found that the p value = 0.050 with a correlation coefficient value of r = 0.312 so that there was a relationship between feeding patterns and the nutritional status of underweight toddlers.Conclusion: there is a relationship between feeding patterns and underweight nutritional status in toddlers (p value = 0.050)Suggestion: For mothers of toddler are expected to increase their knowledge by actively attending toddler classes, and regularly participating in posyandu activities so that you can find out information about providing nutritious food for toddlers which is related to improving parenting patterns for toddlers. Keywords: Feeding patterns, Underweight, Toddlers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".