The Influence of Globalization on Family Traditions and Values
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: In an era marked by unprecedented globalization, understanding its impact on the most fundamental unit of society—the family—becomes crucial. This study aims to explore the multifaceted ways in which globalization influences family traditions and values, focusing on how global cultural flows, technological advancements, economic factors, and intergenerational dynamics reshape familial practices and beliefs. Methods and Materials: Employing a qualitative research design, this study gathered data through semi-structured interviews with 20 participants from diverse cultural backgrounds. The participants were selected to cover a broad age range and varied levels of exposure to globalization. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Thematic analysis was utilized to identify key themes and categories within the data, offering in-depth insights into the participants' experiences and perceptions. Findings: Five main themes were identified: Global Cultural Exchange, Technological Impact, Intergenerational Dynamics, Cultural Adaptation and Resistance, and Economic Influences. Each theme encapsulated several categories and concepts, highlighting the complex interplay between global and local influences on family life. Key findings include the selective adoption of global cultural elements, the transformative role of technology in family interactions, the negotiation between traditional and global values across generations, active engagement in cultural adaptation, and the significant impact of economic factors on family traditions and values. Conclusion: The study reveals that globalization exerts a profound and multifaceted influence on family traditions and values, leading to a dynamic process of adaptation, preservation, and transformation. Families are shown to be active agents in navigating the complexities of global and local cultural streams, demonstrating resilience and adaptability in the face of global cultural and economic pressures. The findings underscore the importance of understanding the nuanced impacts of globalization on the microcosm of family life, contributing to the broader discourse on cultural continuity and change in a globalized world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".