"Empowering Indigenous Self-Determination In-Against-and-Beyond Capitalism: A Theory of Dual Dispossession"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest appreciation for my partner, Theresa, and all the support she has shown me.Without it I never would have come close; not even remotely.She has been everything to me long before all of this.Gi'zaagi'in.I would also like to acknowledge my daughter, Ellie, who brings joy to us every day and means the world to me, as well as Goose, who is on the way.I would like to express my gratitude to my parents, Tony and France, who never fail to ensure that all those around them are well and taken care of, and whose ethics are incomparable.To my sister, Doe, and her partner, Rae, who are stunning examples of what humanity should be, and their amazing children, Loey and Jasper, who have already developed in ways that embody the values we should all be striving for collectively.I also want to express my profound gratitude to Sug, who raised me for the second time, and who has taken life to a whole other level, teaching us all what matters and how to persevere.Your spirit lives in my heart.I would also be remiss if I didn't acknowledge my cousin Tom Borg, who has shared so much knowledge with me over the years and demonstrated what it means to be Anishinaabe and uphold our obligations to the land.To my supervisor, Dr. Julie Tomiak, who showed me such patience and care, who was so gentle with me and my process, teaching me to take my time and giving me the chance to develop myself according to my capacity and truth.Take your time, she insisted despite the pressure to finish, this is about what kind of scholar and person you want to become.What more could one ask for in a supervisor?To Dr. Justin Paulson, who showed such devotion and care and is also undoubtedly one of the central reason my work came together the way it did, consistently taking the time to meet with me and talk things through, insisting on bringing all of my interests together and helping to shape it into a coherent whole.Together they are exemplary, and I aspire to be like them in my own practice.I also want to acknowledge Peter Hodgins, who was a calming voice throughout the process and helped keep me on track; Kahente Horn-Miller, who showed great empathy and reassured me along the way; Jurek Elzanowski, who has been so kind and supportive; William Felepchuk for all his help over the years; Lindy Van Vliet, for
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".