MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396524865 · doi:10.3389/978-2-8325-4862-2

Women in Biogeochemical Dynamics Research: 2022

2024· book· en· W4396524865 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers research topics · 2024
Typebook
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersErasmus+Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaRhode Island Sea Grant, University of Rhode IslandAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloFundación General CSICFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y TecnológicoLinnéuniversitetetMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationMinistère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la RechercheKhalifa University of Science, Technology and ResearchEuropean Regional Development FundEuropean CommissionSvenska Forskningsrådet FormasStrongMinisterio de Ciencia, Tecnología, Conocimiento e InnovaciónVetenskapsrådetFondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Científico y TecnológicoNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBiogeochemical cycleDynamics (music)Environmental scienceChemistryPsychologyEnvironmental chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.266
GPT teacher head0.567
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it