An Engineering Approach to Improve Performance Predictions for Wind Turbine Applications: Comparison with Full Navier-Stokes Model and Experimental Measurements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate predictions of aerodynamic performance and near wake expansion around Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine (HAWT) rotors is pivotal for studying wind turbine wake interactions and optimizing wind farm layouts. This study introduces a novel engineering model centered on stall delay correction to enhance the precision of the Actuator Disk Method (ADM) predictions in both aerodynamic performance and near wake expansion around HAWT rotors. The model is developed based on a comprehensive study of the 3D lift coefficient evolution over the rotor blade, incorporating a shift parameter that considers both stall angle detection and radial decrement. The proposed approach demonstrates remarkable agreements, showcasing discrepancies as low as 7% for both loads and axial wake predictions. These quantifiable results underscore the effectiveness of the model in capturing intricate aerodynamic phenomena. Looking forward, the success of this approach opens avenues for broader applications, guiding future research in wind energy towards improved simulation accuracy and optimized wind farm designs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".