Towards a Model of Snow Accretion for Autonomous Vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Snow accumulation on surfaces exposed to adverse weather conditions has been studied over the years due to a variety of problems observed in different industry sectors, such as aeronautics and wind and civil engineering. With the growing interest in autonomous vehicles (AVs), this concern extends to advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS). Weather stressors, such as snow and icing, negatively influence the sensor functionality of AVs, and their autonomy is not guaranteed by manufacturers during episodes of intense weather precipitation. As a basis for mitigating the negative effects caused by heavy snowfall, models need to be developed to predict snow accumulation over critical surfaces of AVs. The present work proposes a framework for the study of snow accumulation on road vehicles. Existing icing and snow accretion models are reviewed, and adaptations for automotive applications are discussed. Based on the new capabilities developed by the Weather on Wheels (WoW) program at Ontario Tech University, a model architecture is proposed in order to progress toward adequate snow accretion predictions for autonomous vehicle operating conditions, and preliminary results are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".