Enhancing Moisture-Induced Defect Detection in Insulated Steel Pipes through Infrared Thermography and Hybrid Dataset
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is crucial to accurately detect moisture-induced defects in steel pipe insulation in order to combat corrosion under insulation (CUI). This study enhances the capabilities of infrared thermography (IRT) by integrating it with top-performing machine learning models renowned for their effectiveness in image segmentation tasks. A novel methodology was developed to enrich machine learning training, incorporating synthetic datasets generated via finite element method (FEM) simulations with experimental data. The performance of four advanced models—UNet, UNet++, DeepLabV3+, and FPN—was evaluated. These models demonstrated significant enhancements in defect detection capabilities, with notable improvements observed in FPN, which exhibited a mean intersection over union (IoU) increase from 0.78 to 0.94, a reduction in loss from 0.19 to 0.06, and an F1 score increase from 0.92 to 0.96 when trained on hybrid datasets compared to those trained solely on real data. The results highlight the benefits of integrating synthetic and experimental data, effectively overcoming the challenges of limited dataset sizes, and significantly improving the models’ accuracy and generalization capabilities in identifying defects. This approach marks a significant advancement in industrial maintenance and inspection, offering a precise, reliable, and scalable solution to managing the risks associated with CUI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".