Perceptions of mental health and psychosocial problems among conflict-affected adults in North Bougainville: Results of a rapid qualitative assessment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Bougainville Crisis (1988–1997) was characterized by widespread human rights violations, civilian deaths, and displacement. In March 2017, a rapid qualitative assessment was conducted to better understand the major mental health and psychosocial (MHPS) problems of conflict-affected adults living in North Bougainville in order to contribute to the design of feasible interventions to address these problems and inform the development of culturally appropriate assessment instruments. We conducted 54 free-list interviews to gather information on the problems of people in local communities, and further explored five priority MHPS problems through 38 key-informant interviews. The major MHPS problems that emerged and were subsequently explored included alcohol use, drug use, arguments and fights, physical violence against women, and rape. Frequently reported indicators of these problems included anger, aggression, sadness, shame, worry, trauma, neglect, and fear. Findings highlight the highly interconnected relationship between substance use and violence in North Bougainville, as well as the set of emotional and behavioral problems that both contribute to and result from this relationship. The primacy of both drug and alcohol use in this setting is particularly notable, as is the role of these substances as individual coping mechanisms and instigators of violence. Overall, findings suggest the need for integrated strategies toward addressing MHPS issues in North Bougainville, with violence and substance use incorporated as both causes and consequences of psychological distress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".