Comparison of inflammatory markers, coagulation indicators and outcomes between influenza and COVID-19 infection amongst children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Influenza and COVID-19 patients share similar features and outcomes amongst adults. However, the difference between these diseases is not explored in paediatric age group especially in terms of inflammatory markers, coagulation profile and outcomes. Hence, we did this review to compare the inflammatory, coagulation features and outcomes between influenza and COVID-19 infected children. Methods: Literature search was done in PubMed Central, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane library, Google Scholar & ScienceDirect from November 2019 to May 2022. Risk of bias assessment was done through Newcastle Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis was done using random-effects model and the final pooled estimate was reported as pooled odds ratio (OR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) along with 95 % confidence interval (CI) depending on the type of outcome. Results: = 98.3 %) when compared to paediatric COVID-19 patients. There was no significant difference in terms of features like CRP, procalcitonin, serum albumin, aPTT, mortality and need for mechanical ventilation. Conclusion: Inflammatory markers like ESR, LDH and PT was significantly higher in influenza patients when compared to COVID-19 in children, while rest of the markers and adverse clinical outcomes were similar between both the groups. Identification of these biomarkers has helped in understanding the distinctness of COVID-19 and influenza virus and develop better management strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".