Stability analysis for a contaminant convection-reaction-diffusion model of recovered fracturing fluid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to study the stability analysis for a contaminant convection-reactiondiffusion model of the recovered fracturing fluid (RFFM, for short), which couples a nonlinear and nonsmooth stationary incompressible Navier-Stokes equation with a multivalued frictional boundary condition, and a nonlinear reaction-diffusion equation with mixed Neumann boundary conditions.First, we introduce a family of perturbation problems corresponding to (RFFM), and present the variational formulation of perturbation problem which is a perturbation elliptic hemivariational inequality driven by a perturbation nonlinear variational equation.Then, the existence of solutions and the uniform bound of the solution set to the perturbation problem are obtained.Finally, it is established that, as the perturbation parameter tends to zero, the solution set of the perturbation problems converge to the solution set of (RFFM) in the sense of the Kuratowski upper limit.This shows that (RFFM) is stable with respect to the perturbation data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".