Impairment of attention and executive functions in chronic cerebrovascular disease and Alzheimer’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective. To establish specific features of executive functions (EF) impairment and attention in vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Material and methods. Eighty people (over the age of 50) diagnosed with cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and AD, as well as 29 healthy volunteers (control group), were examined. The following neuropsychological methods were used to study the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of cognitive impairments: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), EXIT-25, Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), Clock Drawing Test, «12 Words» test, verbal associations (literal and categorical) method, Trail Making Test A and B, Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Stroop Test, and Benton Visual Retention Test. Mandatory inclusion criteria in the study included having a completed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain (in T1, T2, FLAIR, DWI, SWI modes) within 1 year before enrollment in one of the groups. Results. No significant differences in age, sex, and level of education were found between the groups. Groups AD and CVD were also comparable in the severity of cognitive impairment overall. Attention and working memory deficits were observed in both CVD and AD, with slightly more pronounced deficits in the AD group. Qualitative analysis of individual components of working memory revealed that both CVD and AD groups had comparable cognitive control impairment compared to the control group, while AD was characterized by a more significant decrease in intellectual flexibility compared to CVD. Sustained attention was equally impaired among patients in the CVD and AD groups, with a significant difference from the control group (p<0.05). In terms of memory, it was found that auditory-verbal memory and semantic memory were significantly more affected in AD, while visual memory was impaired in both conditions. Conclusion. Attention and EF impairments are not specific to the «subcortical» type of cognitive disorders. Already in the early stages, AD is characterized by a significant impairment of attention and EF, and such a component of EF as intellectual flexibility suffers at the onset of AD to a greater extent than in VCI. Memory impairments are not specific to AD; already at the onset of VCI, visual memory impairment comparable to AD is noted. The obtained data can be used for early neuropsychological diagnosis and differential diagnosis of dementing cerebral diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".