MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396580663 · doi:10.1037/cpp0000525

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-Based Intervention for Parents Living With Chronic Pain: Feasibility and Acceptability Study

2024· article· en· W4396580663 on OpenAlex
Maria Pavlova, Sara Ahola Kohut, Isabel Jordán, Janice Sumpton, Kyleigh Schraeder, Serena L. Orr, Lindsay Craddock, Mélanie Noël, Kathryn A. Birnie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Pain Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteAlberta Children's HospitalCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of CalgaryInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenOntario Brain InstituteUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcceptance and commitment therapyIntervention (counseling)MedicineChronic painPhysical therapyPsychotherapistPsychologyClinical psychologyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Chronic pain often clusters in families with up to 50% of parents of youth with chronic pain having chronic pain themselves. Interventions for pediatric chronic pain often involve parents, yet parental chronic pain and stress are rarely addressed. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)-based interventions are efficacious for adult chronic pain, making it a potentially well-suited intervention for parents of youth with chronic pain who also have pain and/or mental health issues. In collaboration with patient partners, we developed and tested feasibility and acceptability of a pilot ACT-based virtual intervention focused on parental chronic pain and mental health. Method: Parents of youth with chronic pain who had chronic pain participated in four 1.5-hr weekly sessions delivered virtually. Parents completed pre- and posttreatment measures of pain and mental health symptoms. Feasibility was assessed using session attendance. Parents rated intervention acceptability and provided feedback at the end of the study. Results: Six parents (four mothers, M age = 45.5 years) attended at least three out of four sessions. Parents rated the intervention to be acceptable ( M = 56.7/70). Parents highlighted the sense of community and changes they observed in themselves. Conclusions: The brief virtual ACT-based intervention for parents living with chronic pain was feasible and acceptable. Future clinical trials are warranted to assess the intervention efficacy to improve parental and youth outcomes. Implications for Impact Statement Interventions for pediatric chronic pain often involve parents, yet parental chronic pain and stress are rarely addressed. We developed a brief virtual acceptance and commitment therapy-based intervention for parents of youth with chronic pain who have pain themselves. The intervention was feasible and acceptable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it