ABORDAGENS MINIMAMENTE INVASIVAS NA CORREÇÃO DE CIA EM PACIENTES PEDIÁTRICOS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este estudo analisa a eficácia e segurança de abordagens menos invasivas para corrigir a comunicação interatrial (CIA) em pacientes pediátricos, uma condição que pode levar a complicações graves, como hipertensão pulmonar e insuficiência cardíaca. Através de uma revisão integrativa da literatura de 1980 a 2024, o estudo comparou ecocardiografia transesofágica com ecocardiografia transtorácica e avaliou a eficácia de dispositivos de oclusão percutânea. Os resultados confirmaram que as abordagens menos invasivas são eficazes, melhorando a função cardíaca e reduzindo o tempo de recuperação e risco de infecções. A conclusão destaca a importância dessas técnicas no tratamento da CIA em crianças, demonstrando ser seguras e eficazes. Além disso, o estudo aponta para a necessidade de pesquisas futuras para aprimorar essas intervenções e explorar novas tecnologias, como inteligência artificial, visando alcançar melhores resultados clínicos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".