Health-related quality of life among paediatric patients with coarctation of the aorta: an observational study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advancements in early diagnosis and paediatric cardiac surgery have improved the long-term survival of patients with congenital heart disease, necessitating a thorough assessment of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to assess HRQoL in paediatric patients with coarctation of the aorta (CoA) (both as reported by patients and caregivers), and to evaluate associated factors. Patients aged 5–18 years diagnosed with CoA and their parents were enrolled at Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital between September 2016 and December 2017. Socio-demographic characteristics were recorded using a family form, and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 3.0 cardiac module was used to evaluate HRQoL. Clinical data were retrieved from medical chart reviews. In this observational study, sixty-five pediatric patients (39 males, median [IQR] age 12 [9–14]) with CoA and their parents (65 mothers and 65 fathers) were enrolled. These patients exhibited overall good HRQoL. Mothers reported significantly lower total HRQoL scores compared to patient self-reports (p = .037), as well as treatment anxiety (p = .033), and cognitive problems (p = .021). Pediatric patients with CoA perceived their HRQoL better than their mothers did. Female sex and older age were associated with lower HRQoL scores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".