MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract PS14-08: Safety evaluation from the KEYNOTE-355 study of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

2024· article· en· W4396587176 on OpenAlexaff
Hope Rugo, Peter Schmid, Zbigniew Nowecki, David W. Cescon, Seock‐Ah Im, Mastura Md Yusof, Carlos Gallardo, Hiroji Iwata, Carlos H. Barrios, Sherene Loi, Xuan Zhou, Xiaoli Zhang, Wilbur Pan, Vassiliki Karantza, Javier Cortés

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabChemotherapyOncologyInternal medicineBreast cancerPlaceboTriple-negative breast cancerMetastatic breast cancerRecurrent breast cancerCancerImmunotherapyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: In KEYNOTE-355 (NCT02819518), pembrolizumab (pembro) + chemotherapy (chemo) led to statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PFS and OS (primary endpoints) vs placebo (pbo) + chemo in patients (pts) with previously untreated PD-L1 positive advanced TNBC (combined positive score ≥10). In the overall safety population at final analysis, treatment-related AEs occurred in 96.3% of pts in the pembro + chemo arm and 95.0% of pts in the pbo + chemo arm; immune-mediated AEs occurred in 26.5% and 6.4% of pts, respectively. We report additional safety information, beyond the already reported safety results, on immune-mediated AEs and management from the final analysis of KEYNOTE-355. Methods: Eligible pts were randomized 2:1 to receive pembro 200 mg or pbo Q3W for up to 35 cycles + investigator’s choice of nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine-carboplatin. Safety was assessed in all randomized pts who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. AEs were monitored throughout the study and for 30 d post-treatment (90 d for serious AEs). Results: At final analysis (data cut-off: June 15, 2021), median treatment duration was 6.1 (range, 0.0–48.8) mo in the pembro + chemo arm (n = 562) and 5.3 (range, 0.0–51.5) mo in the pbo + chemo arm (n = 281). Of 157 pts with immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions in the pembro + chemo arm, 125 had grade 1-2 events and 32 had grade 3-4 events; none were grade 5. The most common immune-mediated AEs with pembro + chemo were hypothyroidism (15.8%) and hyperthyroidism (4.3%); infusion reactions occurred in 3.7% of pts (table). Of 89 pts with hypothyroidism, median time to onset was 105 d (range, 19–707 d) and 70 were treated with thyroid replacement, suggesting an endocrine abnormality and need for continued thyroid replacement. Of 24 pts with hyperthyroidism, median time to onset was 53.5 d (range, 20–209 d) and 2 were treated with corticosteroids. Of 21 pts with infusion reactions, median time to onset was 147 d (range, 1–729 d) and 10 were treated with corticosteroids. Other immune-mediated AEs of interest in the pembro + chemo arm were pneumonitis (2.5%) and adrenal insufficiency (1.4%); most of these events were grade 2–3. Of 14 pts with pneumonitis, median time to onset was 99.5 d (range, 29–288 d) and 11 were treated with corticosteroids; median episode duration was 56 d. All 8 pts with adrenal insufficiency were treated with hormone replacement. There were no reports of hypophysitis. Conclusion: In pts with previously untreated advanced TNBC, pembro + chemo had a manageable safety profile that was generally consistent with the known safety profiles of pembro and the chemo regimens. Most immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions were grade 1-2, manageable with treatment interruption, corticosteroids, and/or hormone replacement therapy, and did not result in discontinuation of study treatment. Together with the efficacy findings, our results support pembro + chemo as a standard of care regimen for these pts. Table. Citation Format: Hope Rugo, Peter Schmid, Zbigniew Nowecki, David Cescon, Seock-Ah Im, Mastura Yusof, Carlos Gallardo, Hiroji Iwata, Carlos Barrios, Sherene Loi, Xuan Zhou, Xiaoli Zhang, Wilbur Pan, Vassiliki Karantza, Javier Cortés. Safety evaluation from the KEYNOTE-355 study of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS14-08.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→