MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract RF02-01: A Multicenter, Phase I/II Trial of Anastrozole, Palbociclib, Trastuzumab, and Pertuzumab in Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive, HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (ASPIRE)

2024· article· en· W4396596413 on OpenAlexaff
Rima Patel, Krystal Cascetta, Paula Klein, Erin Moshier, Maryann Kwa, Julie Fasano, Anupama Goel, Melissa Accordino, Charles L. Shapiro, R Vaccaro, Gargi Joshi, Joseph A. Sparano, Amy Tiersten

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPertuzumabPalbociclibAnastrozoleMedicineTrastuzumabMetastatic breast cancerOncologyInternal medicineBreast cancerLetrozoleHormone receptorCancerTamoxifen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Among patients (pts) with HR-positive and HER2-positive breast cancer, crosstalk between HER2 and estrogen receptor (ER) signaling pathways may contribute to endocrine resistance but anti-HER2 agents in combination with endocrine therapy can restore endocrine sensitivity. Mechanistically, HER2/HER3 signaling promotes survival by way of PI3K-AKT activation whereas ER-CDK4/6-Rb signaling promotes cell cycle progression. The combination of anti-HER2 therapy with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) and a CDK 4/6 inhibitor would allow for blockade of both pathways and provide a novel, all biologic, and chemotherapy-free approach to the treatment of HR-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: We conducted a phase I/II multi-institution trial in pts with previously untreated, HR-positive and HER2-positive MBC. In the Phase I portion, pts received escalating doses of palbociclib (100mg, 125mg) in conjunction with trastuzumab, pertuzumab and an AI anastrozole, using a 3+3 dose escalation trial design. In the phase II portion, pts received palbociclib at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), anastrozole, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab. The primary endpoints of the Phase I and II portions were MTD and clinical benefit rate (CBR) defined as the sum of complete response, partial response, and stable disease for >/= 6 months, respectively. Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. The Phase II portion of this study was powered with 30 pts to show efficacy of palbociclib administered at the MTD in combination with anastrozole, trastuzumab and pertuzumab if the CBR achieved at 6 months exceeded 58%. The Clopper-Pearson method was used to calculate confidence intervals for ORR and CBR. The PFS distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: In the Phase I portion, a total of 9 pts were enrolled. No DLTs were observed at the 100mg dose (N=3) or the 125mg dose (N=6) level, and thus, 125mg was established as the MTD. An additional 24 pts were enrolled to the Phase II portion at the MTD, with a total of 30 pts in the modified intention-to-treat population included in the efficacy analysis. The median age of the population was 57.6 years (range 50.5-63.8) and 27% of pts were premenopausal and received ovarian function suppression as part of treatment. As shown in Table 1, the primary endpoint, CBR, was 97% (95% CI: 0.83-1.0, p<0.0001). ORR was 70% (95% CI: 0.51-0.85). Median time to objective response was 2.8 months with earliest response at 3 months. Median duration of response was not reached with range of 5.1-42.2 months. Median PFS was also not reached with range of 8-44.8 months. Safety data were consistent with known toxicity profiles of agents. Most common adverse events included diarrhea (80%), neutropenia (77%), leukopenia (70%), anemia (67%), and fatigue (60%). Grade 3-4 events occurred in 63% (19/30) of pts and included neutropenia (68%), leukopenia (32%), decrease in absolute neutrophil count (21%), and anemia (21%). Conclusions: The combination of anastrozole, palbociclib, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab was well tolerated and effective with a clinical benefit rate of 97% in pts with previously untreated HR-positive, HER2-positive MBC. The combination provides a chemotherapy-free alternative for pts with triple positive breast cancers. Further follow up will determine impact on PFS. Table 1. Results in Patients on Anastrozole, Palbociclib, Trastuzumab, and Pertuzumab Citation Format: Rima Patel, Krystal Cascetta, Paula Klein, Erin Moshier, Maryann Kwa, Julie Fasano, Anupama Goel, Melissa Accordino, Charles Shapiro, Rita Vaccaro, Gargi Atul Joshi, Joseph Sparano, Amy Tiersten. A Multicenter, Phase I/II Trial of Anastrozole, Palbociclib, Trastuzumab, and Pertuzumab in Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive, HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (ASPIRE) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr RF02-01.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesFrench-language works237,207