MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396601798 · doi:10.1164/rccm.202311-2192oc

Exploring Definitions and Predictors of Severe Asthma Clinical Remission after Biologic Treatment in Adults

2024· article· en· W4396601798 on OpenAlexafffund
Luis Pérez de Llano, Ghislaine Scélo, Trung N. Tran, Tham Le, Malin Fagerås, Borja G. Cosío, Matthew Peters, Paul Pfeffer, Mona Al‐Ahmad, Riyad Al‐Lehebi, Alan Altraja, Céline Bergeron, Leif Bjermer, Anne Sofie Bjerrum, Lakmini Bulathsinhala, John Busby, Diana Jimena Cano Rosales, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Victoria Carter, Jérémy Charriot, George Christoff, Eve Denton, Delbert R. Dorscheid, María José Fernández Sánchez, João Fonseca, Peter G. Gibson, Celine Goh, Liam G. Heaney, Enrico Heffler, Mark Hew, Takashi Iwanaga, Rohit Katial, Mariko Siyue Koh, Piotr Kuna, Désirée Larenas‐Linnemann, Lauri Lehtimäki, Bassam Mahboub, Neil Martin, Hisako Matsumoto, Andrew Menzies‐Gow, Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos, Todor A. Popov, Celeste Porsbjerg, Pujan Patel, Chin Kook Rhee, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Camille Taillé, Carlos A. Torres‐Duque, Ming‐Ju Tsai, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, John W. Upham, Anna von Bülow, Eileen Wang, Michael E. Wechsler, David Price

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalVancouver Hospital and Health Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGenentechKuwait Foundation for the Advancement of SciencesMichael Smith Health Research BCAllergy TherapeuticsBritish Columbia Lung AssociationGilead SciencesNovartis Pharmaceuticals UK LimitedAmgenCanadian Thoracic SocietySanofiAstraZenecaGlaxoSmithKlineEuropean Respiratory SocietySeqirusRegeneron PharmaceuticalsTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesAmerican Thoracic Society
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaIntensive care medicineMEDLINEPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale There is no consensus on criteria to include in an asthma remission definition in real life. Factors associated with achieving remission after biologic initiation remain poorly understood. Objectives To quantify the proportion of adults with severe asthma achieving multidomain-defined remission after biologic initiation and identify prebiologic characteristics associated with achieving remission that may be used to predict it. Methods This was a longitudinal cohort study using data from 23 countries from the International Severe Asthma Registry. Four asthma outcome domains were assessed in the 1 year before and after biologic initiation. A priori–defined remission cutoffs were: 0 exacerbations/yr, no long-term oral corticosteroid (LTOCS), partly/well-controlled asthma, and percent predicted FEV1 ⩾ 80%. Remission was defined using two (exacerbations + LTOCS), three (+control or +lung function), and four of these domains. The association between prebiologic characteristics and postbiologic remission was assessed by multivariable analysis. Measurements and Main Results A total of 50.2%, 33.5%, 25.8%, and 20.3% of patients met criteria for two-, three- (+control), three- (+lung function), and four-domain remission, respectively. The odds of achieving four-domain remission decreased by 15% for every additional 10 years of asthma duration (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.73–1.00). The odds of remission increased in those with fewer exacerbations per year, lower LTOCS daily dose, better control, and better lung function before biologic initiation. Conclusions One in five patients achieved four-domain remission within 1 year of biologic initiation. Patients with less severe impairment and shorter asthma duration at initiation had a greater chance of achieving remission after biologic treatment, indicating that biologic treatment should not be delayed if remission is the goal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations113
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207