THE WAY TO STREFISM: THE EVOLUTION OF LEON CHWISTEK’S ARTISTIC PRINCIPLES IN THE CONTEXT OF EUROPEAN MODERNISM OF 1917–1925
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Творческий метод польского художника, философа, математика, логика и теоретика искусства Леона Хвистека (1884–1944 гг.) формировался в контексте ведущих европейских художественных тенденций первой четверти XX в. Восприняв опыт экспрессионизма, кубизма, орфизма и футуризма, к 1922 г. мастер пришел к созданию собственной художественной системы. Стрефизм стал первым этапом на пути развития польского абстрактного искусства. The artist’s method of Leon Chwistek (1884–1944), Polish artist, philosopher, mathematician, logician and art theorist, was formed in the context of leading european artistic trends of the first quarter of the ХХ century. Having embraced the experience of expressionism, cubism, orphism and futurism, by 1922 the painter came to create his own artistic system. Strefism was the first stage in the development of Polish abstract art.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".