MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396618963 · doi:10.1007/s10909-024-03124-y

The SQUID Controller Unit for the LiteBIRD Space Mission: Description, Functional Tests and Early Performance Assessment

2024· article· en· W4396618963 on OpenAlexaff
Giulia Conenna, A. Tartari, G. Signorelli, A. Passerini, A. Limonta, M. Zannoni, Paolo Dal Bo, E. Di Giorgi, Jean-François Cliche, S. Della Torre, M. Dobbs, L. Galli, M. Gervasi, M. Massa, Andrea Moggi, J. Montgomery, D. Nicolò, Michele Pinchera, G. Smecher, Franco Spinella

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Low Temperature Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsThree-Speed Logic (Canada)McGill University
FundersMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaUniversità degli Studi di Milano-BicoccaUniversità degli Studi di Milano
KeywordsSquidUnit (ring theory)Space (punctuation)PhysicsController (irrigation)Computer scienceAerospace engineeringBiologyMathematicsEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract LiteBIRD is a satellite mission to be launched by JAXA in the early 2030s. It will measure the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) primordial B-modes with an unprecedented sensitivity. Microwave radiation will be detected by Transition Edge Sensors (TESs) arrays multiplexed in frequency domain and read by Superconducting QUantum Interference Devices (SQUIDs). The LiteBIRD SQUID Controller Unit (SCU), based on the heritage of the successful design used for the ground-based SPT3G experiment, presents some novel elements that make it suitable for a space-borne application. We compare our first breadboard model with the ground-based, Off-The-Shelf Components (COTS) version, by driving the same SQUID Array Amplifier (SAA) at 4 K, measuring relevant quantities such as noise, gain and bandwidth. We demonstrate that the noise added by our first prototype (including a switching part for redundancy purposes) never exceeds the noise added by the COTS-based electronics board, representing our benchmark. We also present the first noise estimates with the SAA cooled below 1 K, going closer to the conditions expected for LiteBIRD operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Low Temperature PhysicsSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207