MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396622954 · doi:10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100085

Increasing early career surgeon engagement in the Society for Vascular Surgery: A report of the Society’s Young Surgeons Section Steering Committee

2024· article· en· W4396622954 on OpenAlexaff
Chelsea Dorsey, Rana O. Afifi, Edward J. Arous, Saideep Bose, Nathan Droz, Laura M. Drudi, Michael M. McNally, Nicolas J. Mouawad, Leigh Ann O’Banion, Carlos Pineda, Christine Shokrzadeh, M. Libby Weaver, Gregory A. Magee, Edward Gifford

Bibliographic record

VenueJVS-Vascular Insights · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiversity and Career in Medicine
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSection (typography)Steering committeeMedicineMedical educationEngineeringBusinessEngineering management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When examining the US surgical workforce, a shortage of approximately 30,000 surgeons is predicted by 2030. This shortage is attributed to the increasing surgical needs of the nation’s aging population and the increased rate of retirement in the surgeon workforce. As such, the surgeon workforce will rely on Millennials and Generation Z to grow and expand their role in healthcare. To address these changes, the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) established the Young Surgeons Section (YSS) in 2022 after formal approval by the Society’s Executive Board. The YSS Steering Committee set forth in 2022 with an initial charge focused on identifying the needs of this demographic, beginning to develop educational content focused on early career surgeons, providing and advocating for leadership opportunities within the SVS, and assisting the Society in its membership recruitment efforts. The goal of this report is to provide the context under which the YSS was started, outline the major accomplishments of the Section over its first 2 years, and to begin to discuss the needed next steps for the SVS to ensure continued engagement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJVS-Vascular InsightsSame topicDiversity and Career in MedicineFrench-language works237,207