An oxylipin signal confers protection against antifungal echinocandins in pathogenic aspergilli
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aspergillus fumigatus is the leading causative agent of life-threatening invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised individuals. One antifungal class used to treat Aspergillus infections is the fungistatic echinocandins, semisynthetic drugs derived from naturally occurring fungal lipopeptides. By inhibiting beta-1,3-glucan synthesis, echinocandins cause both fungistatic stunting of hyphal growth and repeated fungicidal lysis of apical tip compartments. Here, we uncover an endogenous mechanism of echinocandin tolerance in A. fumigatus whereby the inducible oxylipin signal 5,8-diHODE confers protection against tip lysis via the transcription factor ZfpA. Treatment of A. fumigatus with echinocandins induces 5,8-diHODE synthesis by the fungal oxygenase PpoA in a ZfpA dependent manner resulting in a positive feedback loop. This protective 5,8-diHODE/ZfpA signaling relay is conserved among diverse isolates of A. fumigatus and in two other Aspergillus pathogens. Our findings reveal an oxylipin-directed growth program-possibly arisen through natural encounters with native echinocandin producing fungi-that enables echinocandin tolerance in pathogenic aspergilli.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".