MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396651487 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae102.169

262 Modulation of vitamin D, calcium and phosphorous metabolism and immune response in pre- and post-weaning piglets under different vitamin D supplementation strategies

2024· article· en· W4396651487 on OpenAlexaff
Danyel Bueno Dalto, Geneviève Villeneuve, Frédéric Guay, J. J. Matte, Jérôme Lapointe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenstrual Health and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeaningImmune systemCalciumVitamin D and neurologyImmune modulationVitaminEndocrinologyMetabolismInternal medicineMedicineBiologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study evaluated the impact of different vitamin D supplementation strategies to pre- and post-weaning piglets on vitamin D, calcium and phosphorous metabolism and immune status. Sixty piglets were selected at d 2 of age [body weight (BW) = 1.71 ± 0.03 kg] and orally supplemented with saline (CTR) or a solution of 25(OH)D3 at d 2, d 8, and d 21 (0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 mg, respectively) along with UVB exposure every second day from d1 4 up to d 21 (HD). From weaning (d 21) until d 42, CTR animals were supplemented with 2,000 UI of vitamin D3/kg of feed and HD animals were supplemented with 2,000 UI 25(OH)D3/kg. Piglets were sacrificed at d 21, d 28, and d 35 (n = 10/treatment/d) for the collection of blood, jejunum, liver, and kidney samples. Serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations were determined by HPLC and the mRNA expression of genes implicated in vitamin D, calcium and phosphorous metabolism and immune status were assessed by quantitative real-time PCR. Data were analyzed using a 2x3 factorial design. Serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations were 2.8, 3.6, and 2.2-fold greater in HD piglets at d 21, 28, and 35 (P ≤ 0.01), respectively (Table 1). No treatment or treatment x time interaction was detected on the expression of genes related to vitamin D metabolism in the jejunum mucosa and liver (P ≥ 0.19). In kidney, HD piglets had greater expression of CYP27B1 (P = 0.09) and decreased expression of CYP24A1 (P = 0.06). Renal EGR1 expression was greater in HD piglets (P = 0.01). No treatment effect was detected on the expression of genes directly implicated in phosphate or calcium reabsorption (P ≥ 0.16). No treatment or treatment x time interaction was detected on the mRNA expression of selected genes related to immune response in the jejunum mucosa, liver, and kidney (P ≥ 0.14). Independently of vitamin D treatments, time effects were detected for gene expression. The mRNA expression of CYP27B1 increased and that of CYP24A1 decreased from d 28 to 35 (P ≤ 0.04) in kidney. Genes related to calcium (TRPV5) and phosphate (NPT2c) reabsorption in kidney had reduced mRNA expression on d 35 compared with d 21 (P ≤ 0.01). Overall, the mRNA expression of genes related to immune response in all studied tissues was lower at d 35 compared with d 21 (P ≤ 0.08). Bodyweight at slaughter was not affected by treatments at d 21, 28, and 35 (P ≥ 0.29). In conclusion, pre-weaning vitamin D supplementation enhanced vitamin D status at weaning and the use of dietary 25(OH)D3 supplementation was more effective in increasing the vitamin D status post-weaning. The mRNA expression results suggest that greater vitamin D status at weaning and during the first 2 wk post-weaning do not affect calcium and phosphate reabsorption in kidney and the immune defense of pre- and post-weaning piglets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicMenstrual Health and DisordersFrench-language works237,207