MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396656302 · doi:10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.387

EXERCISE IN ADULTS WITH ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2024· review· en· W4396656302 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher Hanbury-Brown, Prof Maria A. Fiatarone Singh, Michael Inskip, Dr Michelle Ogrodnik, Dr Jennifer Heisz, Yorgi Mavros

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Exercise Physiology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderPsychologyAttention deficitAttention deficit disorderPsychiatryClinical psychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION & AIMS Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders in adults. Stimulant medications are first-line treatments, they have many side effects and do not address common comorbidities such as cardiometabolic disease, depression, and anxiety. Exercise, by contrast, not only improves ADHD symptoms in youth but effectively treats such comorbidities, making it a potentially valuable treatment option. However, exercise efficacy in adults with ADHD has not been systematically reviewed. Therefore, we aimed to summarise the results of acute exercise and training interventions on health-related outcomes for adults with ADHD, including ADHD symptoms, cognitive function, and psychological well-being. METHODS Using PRISMA guidelines, fifteen databases were searched (including grey literature) on 27/08/2020, yielding 22,088 unique publications. Database alerts were created to capture additional studies (n= 2). Screening, data extraction, Risk of Bias and GRADE assessment was conducted by CEHB. RESULTS Seven acute (6 cycling, 1 self-selected, 1 yoga) and 6 training studies (Yoga, Pilates, Kickboxing, Tai Chi, General Coordination, Group Circuit Class, Cycling) were included. Among acute studies, those reporting small-to-moderate improvements in cognitive function were characterised by longer duration exercise (>30 minutes), withholding ADHD medication before exercise, and using cohorts with clinician-confirmed ADHD diagnosis. Among the training studies, only one reported an improvement in cognition following Pilates when compared to an inactive control. It was longer (6 months vs. <8 weeks), prescribed progressive intensity and volume, and had high adherence compared to the non-significant trials. The certainty of evidence was low or very low for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Overall, acute exercise may have a small positive effect on cognition in adults with ADHD; however, certainty of the evidence is low. Further research is needed to investigate the impact of different modalities, durations, and intensities of acute exercise and chronic exercise on adult ADHD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Exercise PhysiologySame topicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFrench-language works237,207