HEPN-AbiV is an RNase in the antiphage system AbiV
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Prokaryotes and eukaryotes possess defense systems, which can be either innate or acquired, to protect against viral infections. At the bacterial population level, abortive infection (Abi) serves as an innate immune defense mechanism against phage invasion. The AbiV antiviral system is prevalent in several bacterial genomes and exhibits diverse characteristics in terms of gene composition and evolution. Our investigation into the Lactococcus AbiV system revealed a novel two-component system, abiV1 and abiV2 , both of which are essential for its function as a type III toxin-antitoxin system. The toxin component AbiV (product of abiV1 ) is an RNase belonging to the HEPN (Higher Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes Nucleotide-binding) superfamily as it carries the consensus Rx4-6H motif. In vivo assays coupled with mass spectrometry showed that the lactococcal AbiV was expressed in the presence or absence of phages while in vitro experiments demonstrated that AbiV1 degraded ribosomal RNA but not mRNA. On the other hand, the antitoxin component ( abiV2 ) was found to function as an RNA molecule that inhibited the nuclease activity of the AbiV1 toxin. The structural characterization of AbiV revealed that this RNase utilizes a large patch of positively charged area across the dimer to anchor RNA molecules. In addition, we showed that the AbiV N-terminal region (amino acids 1 to 23) is crucial for its RNase activity as a truncated AbiV lacking this segment adopted distinct conformational states incompatible with RNA binding. This study provided novel insights into the mode of action of the antiviral system AbiV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".