Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a difficult journey from emergency coronary artery bypass grafting to left ventricular assist device
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Excluding spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) as an aetiology of acute coronary syndrome in young adults is imperative. Case summary: A previously healthy 39-year-old woman experienced sudden severe chest pain, ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram, necessitating high-dose aspirin and urgent transfer to a revascularization centre. Suffering ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF), she underwent two rounds of advanced life support and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Diagnosed with left main coronary artery (LMCA) SCAD, she was initially started on conservative therapy for declining left ventricular ejection fraction. However, she continued to experience an escalating anginal symptoms, worsening biomarkers, and LMCA SCAD progression, which urged the need for surgical intervention with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Following her CABG, she experienced a worsening of her functional mitral regurgitating, which she underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair of her severe mitral regurgitation. Despite being listed for orthotopic heart transplantation (OHTx), her low body mass index and elevated antibodies necessitated the HeartMate III left ventricular assist device (LVAD) for bridge to transplant. After treating frequent VT episodes with medications, she eventually received a LVAD as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. Within 1 year of her receiving LVAD, she underwent a successful OHTx. Discussion: The pathogenesis of SCAD involves intramural haematoma formation through intimal tears or vasa vasorum haemorrhage. Adverse outcomes that could occur in SCAD patients include cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, reduced left ventricle systolic function, and occasionally serious cardiac arrhythmia-such as VF-which can lead to sudden cardiac death. Although most SCAD cases heal spontaneously, revascularization can be considered in case of worsening SCAD progression. Advanced therapeutic intervention including mechanical circulatory support and OHTx should be considered in refractory cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".