A systematic review of diet, nutrition, and medication use among centenarians and near centenarians worldwide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Centenarians represent a phenomenon of successful aging, yet little is known about their lifestyle and health practices, including diet/nutrition, medication use, and health conditions. A protocol for this systematic review was registered previously (1) . We systematically searched Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, and grey literature from 2000 to 2022, limited to quantitative studies published in English among adults aged 95 years or above. Two reviewers independently screened 3,392 records and identified and extracted data from 34 eligible studies. Additionally, they independently assessed the study quality using the Modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (mNOS) (2) . Any disagreement was discussed and resolved with a third reviewer. In analysis, pooled prevalence was provided for categorical variables on demographics, lifestyles, medications, and diseases using % (95%CI); mean or median was provided for continuous variables. Due to study heterogeneity, we conducted a narrative synthesis for the associations between the exposures and outcomes. Over 70% of the included studies met 6/8 criteria based on the mNOS; nearly half did not mention or control for confounders in statistical analyses. The age ranged from 95-118y (32 studies: 100y+; 2 studies: mean age 97-98 y); the majority were females (75%; 95%CI: 71%,78%). Most centenarians did not smoke or drink [current smokers: 7% (5%, 9%); former smokers:16% (12%, 19%); daily drinkers: 27% (20%, 34%); former drinkers:21% (13%, 30%)]. Most centenarians were physically inactive (23%; 20%, 26%). Over 50% had normal weight (52%; 42%, 61%), 33% (14%, 52%) underweight, and 14% (8%, 20%) overweight. Regarding nutrition, the narrative synthesis suggests that centenarians had normal levels of albumin (3.8g/dL), total triglycerides (111mg/dL), total (188mg/dL), and HDL cholesterol (54mg/dL) but high levels of LDL cholesterol (109mg/dL). Regarding medications, nearly 50% took antihypertensive medications (49%; 14%, 84%) or other cardiovascular drugs (48%; 24%, 71%); they took a median of 5 (range: 2-7) drugs. Common conditions included impairment of basic activities of daily living (ADL) (54%; 33%, 74%), hypertension (43%; 21%, 65%), and diabetes (22%; 9%, 52%). In regression analyses among centenarians, high dietary diversity, lower salt preference, and weight status were significant factors for more independence in basic ADL, lower mortality, and greater longevity. For example, a high dietary diversity score was associated with a low mortality risk [0.93 (0.92, 0.94) per unit increase]; those who preferred salty food versus those who did not had a 3.6-fold risk of impaired ADL [adj.OR: 3.59 (1.14, 11.25)]. Being overweight vs. normal weight reduced the risk of ADL impairment [adj.OR: 0.84 (0.78, 0.91] while underweight increased this risk [adj.OR:1.34 (1.28, 1.41)]. Also, overweight [adj.OR: 0.92 (0.90, 0.94)] or abdominal obesity [adj.OR: 0.72 (0.52, 0.996)] reduced the likelihood of longevity per kg increase. This systematic review suggests a healthy lifestyle, good nutrition, and normal body weight may contribute to extreme longevity. Interpreting these summary findings should be cautious due to potential recall bias and heterogeneity of the included studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".