Spatiotemporal patterns corresponding to phase synchronization and generalized synchronization states of thermoacoustic instability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thermoacoustic instability in turbulent combustion systems emerges from the complex interplay among the flame, flow, and acoustic subsystems. While the onset of thermoacoustic instability exhibits a global order, the characteristics of local interactions between subsystems responsible for this order are not well understood. Here, we utilize the framework of synchronization to elucidate the spatiotemporal interactions among heat release rate fluctuations in the flame, velocity fluctuations in the flow, and acoustic pressure fluctuations in a turbulent combustor, across the bluff-body stabilized flame. We examine two forms of thermoacoustic instability, characterized by phase synchronization and generalized synchronization of the acoustic pressure and global heat release rate oscillations. Despite the presence of global synchrony, we uncover a coexistence of frequency synchrony and desynchrony in the local interaction of these oscillations within the reaction field. In regions of frequency-locked oscillations, various phase-locking patterns occur, including phase synchrony and partial phase synchrony. We observe that the local formation of small pockets of phase synchrony and strong amplitude correlation between these oscillations is sufficient to trigger the state of global phase synchronization. As the global dynamics approach generalized synchronization, these local regions of synchrony expand in the reaction field. Additionally, through coupled analysis of acoustic pressure and local flow velocity fluctuations, we infer that the spatial region of flow-acoustic synchrony plays a significant role in governing thermoacoustic instabilities. Our findings imply that, in turbulent combustors, an intrinsic local balance between order, partial order, and disorder within the coupled subsystems sustains the global order during thermoacoustic instability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".