MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396701010 · doi:10.11159/iceptp24.118

NH-16 Traffic and Meteorology Impact on Ozone Pollution in Kharagpur, India

2024· article· en· W4396701010 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Samrat Santra, Aditya Kumar Patra, Arpan Chakraborty, Abhishek Penchala

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCOVID-19 impact on air quality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceAir pollutionPollutionOzoneRoad trafficGeographyTransport engineeringEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study focuses on ozone (O3) pollution resulting from road traffic in India (special focus on National Highways), where diesel and petrol are major fuels used for transportation system which are major contributors to O3 forming precursors such as NOx and VOC emissions.Data is collected by using a Serinus 10 ozone analyzer and a portable weather station Kestrel 5500.Using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), O3 concentration levels are predicted along NH-16 in Kharagpur, West Bengal, India.The MLR model performance is assessed by R-squared, and F-test, along with AIC and BIC tests which are evidencing that MLR is the most suitable model, accurately predicting O3 pollution levels.The study reveals that the 8-h average O3 concentrations (117.24µg m -3 ) exceed NAAQS 2009 (100 µg m -3 ) and WHO 2021 (100 µg m -3 ) standards.Higher traffic volume correlates negatively (r = -0.87)with lower O3 levels.Moderate south-east winds elevate O3 levels and transport pollutants away from the traffic area.Urgent action is needed, including comprehensive O3 pollution assessment on India's national highways and policy measures to mitigate it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental EngineeringSame topicCOVID-19 impact on air qualityFrench-language works237,207