MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396701082 · doi:10.11159/iceptp24.154

Kinetic Enhancements in Anaerobic Digestion for Biogas Production: The Effect of Microwave Pretreatment

2024· article· en· W4396701082 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuxuan Li, Luiza C. Campos, Yukun Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnaerobic digestionBiogas productionBiogasProduction (economics)Digestion (alchemy)Kinetic energyMicrowaveAnaerobic exerciseEnvironmental sciencePulp and paper industryBiochemical engineeringProcess engineeringWaste managementChemistryMethaneComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsChromatographyBiologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The kinetics of sludge biogas generation plays a pivotal role in the sustainable management of wastewater treatment processes and the production of renewable energy.Biogas, primarily comprising methane and carbon dioxide, emerges from the anaerobic digestion of organic matter in waste activated sludge.The efficiency and rate of biogas production are crucial in evaluating the sustainability and feasibility of biogas as an energy source.With the growing global energy demands and the pressing need for sustainable waste management, understanding these factors becomes paramount in optimising biogas production systems.Among the various strategies explored to enhance biogas generation efficiency, microwave pretreatment has garnered attention.This method employs microwave radiation to modify the physical and chemical properties of sludge [1], potentially increasing its biodegradability by disrupting cell membranes and releasing intracellular materials.In this study, the Modified-Gompertz (MG) model is utilized for the analysis and prediction of the effects of microwave pretreatment on sludge biogas generation.The MG model, known for its accuracy in describing the sigmoidal pattern of biogas production, is particularly suitable for assessing the impact of microwave pretreatment on biogas generation rates and lag phase duration [2].Data from five recent research papers [3-7], covering a range of sludge types, forms the basis of this investigation, ensuring a comprehensive analysis across various treatment conditions.The findings from the analysis are significant.The MG model demonstrates high predictive accuracy post-microwave pretreatment, with correlation coefficients consistently above 0.95 and a minimal percentage error of 4.67%.This indicates the model's robustness in forecasting biogas yield in the context of microwave pretreatment.Additionally, the study reveals that the kinetics of biogas production are dependent on the sludge substrate, with municipal wastewater sludge showing notably enhanced biogas production compared to food or grease co-digested sludge.One of the most notable outcomes of this study is the observed reduction in lag time following microwave pretreatment.The lag phase duration is reduced by about half compared to conventional heating, dropping from 7-10 days to just 2-5 days.This accelerated onset of biogas production indicates a more efficient process overall.In conclusion, the research highlights the effectiveness of microwave pretreatment in improving sludge biogas generation kinetics, particularly by speeding up the lag phase.These findings offer valuable insights into the potential applications of microwave pretreatment in enhancing wastewater treatment and biogas production processes.As the quest for sustainable energy and waste management solutions intensifies, further research in this domain could focus on optimizing microwave pretreatment parameters, examining scalability for industrial applications, and evaluating the long-term economic and environmental benefits of integrating such technologies into wastewater treatment infrastructures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental EngineeringSame topicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionFrench-language works237,207