MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396701181 · doi:10.11159/icsect24.165

Strength Properties of Pervious Concrete Made with Locally Produced Recycled Coarse Aggregate

2024· article· en· W4396701181 on OpenAlex
Sami W. Tabsh, Adil K. Al-Tamimi, Magdi El-Emam

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRecycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPervious concreteAggregate (composite)Materials scienceComposite materialCement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pervious concrete is a special type of concrete that addresses critical environmental issues and supports green, sustainable construction.In such concrete, little or no sand is employed in the mix in order to allow the formation of considerable void content leading to high permeability.In this study, seven pervious concrete mixes made with recycled coarse aggregate and containing different amount of natural fine aggregate are tested in the laboratory for their strength.The source of the coarse aggregate is demolished old concrete buildings in the United Arab Emirates.One of the mixes contains 100% natural coarse aggregate without natural sand, another 100% recycled coarse aggregate without natural sand, and the remaining 5 mixes include both recycled coarse aggregate and fine natural aggregate such that the amount of fine-to-coarse aggregate is 1.5-11.7%.Results of the study revealed that that the use of recycled coarse aggregate in pervious concrete without fine aggregate reduced the compressive strength by 36% and tensile strength by 57%.Replacing 4.7% of the recycled coarse aggregate with natural sand in such concrete helped in restoring the compressive strength to the level of the control mix that contained natural coarse aggregate.Likewise, replacing 11.7% of the recycled coarse aggregate with natural sand in concrete mix aided in restoring the split cylinder tensile strength to the level of the control mix that contained natural coarse aggregate.There is a relationship between compressive and tensile strengths, of which a lower bound can be reasonably predicted by models proposed for pervious concrete in the literature.The study confirms the feasibility of using recycled aggregate in pervious concrete mixes if about 10% natural fine aggregate is utilized in the mix as replacement of the recycled coarse aggregate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it