Xylanase, xylooligosaccharide and xylitol production from lignocellulosic biomass: Exploring biovalorization of xylan from a sustainable biorefinery perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of lignocellulose biomass (LCB) based platform chemicals and other byproducts has become imperative in order to reduce global carbon footprints and maximise utilization of renewable energy sources. LCB derived xylan is an abundantly accessible feedstock that can be subjected to pretreatment and enzymatic bioconversion using microbe-derived xylanolytic secretomes. The enzymatic breakdown of xylan into xylooligosaccharides (XOS) and xylose requires synergistic action of xylanases and other debranching enzymes. XOS, being short chain oligosaccharides, act as substrates to establish the commensal microbiome in the lower gut of animals and exhibit prebiotic properties. Further, D-xylose, a pentose sugar, obtained from xylan hydrolysis can be converted into xylitol (C 5 H 12 O 5 ) which is widely used in food and pharmaceutical industries as an alternative sweetener. The researchers have extensively reviewed cellulose-based biorefineries that focus on integrated product generation. However, valorization of hemicellulosic xylan extracted from agricultural biomass to generate industrially relevant products requires a comprehensive analysis. This article, therefore, highlights sustainable operations using LCB for the production of xylanolytic enzymes, xylooligosaccharides and xylitol. Insights into knowledge gaps and technological challenges have been discussed with a focus on enzymatic hydrolysis of LCB xylan and multi-product framework from a biorefinery standpoint.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".