MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396719806 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.4c00579

Modeling the Reduction of Ship Exhaust Emissions through CO<sub>2</sub> Capture/Chemical Conversion and SO<sub>2</sub> Seawater Scrubbing

2024· article· en· W4396719806 on OpenAlexaff
Ion Iliuta, Faı̈çal Larachi, Markus Schubert, Eugeny Y. Kenig

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData scrubbingEnvironmental scienceSeawaterWaste managementExhaust gasReduction (mathematics)Environmental chemistryChemistryProcess engineeringEngineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developing innovative, energy-efficient technologies to capture CO 2 from marine emissions and convert it represents an effective way to move toward a circular approach to reduce CO 2 emissions. Additionally, SO 2 removal, as a short-term interim solution for the current maritime sector, allows the use of less desulfurized/expensive fuels to meet International Maritime Organization emission standards. In this context, we investigated an integrated process of capturing CO 2 /SO 2 onboard ships and converting captured CO 2, thus initiating a process close to carbon neutrality. CO 2 absorption by monoethanolamine and SO 2 scrubbing with seawater were envisaged in packed-bed columns, whose hydrodynamics and performance were analyzed under vertical, inclined, and rolling conditions using three-dimensional (3D) Eulerian models to understand their behavior under changing ocean states. CO 2 conversion via an integrated process combining a sorption-enhanced reverse water gas shift and sorption-enhanced methanol synthesis was proposed. By including a reverse water gas shift and in situ H 2 O removal, CO and methanol yields were significantly improved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207