MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396721251 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30874

Effects of therapeutic ultrasound in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4396721251 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yan Luo, Masoud Rahmati, Abdolreza Kazemi, Wenbing Liu, Seung Won Lee, Razak M. Gyasi, Guillermo F. López Sánchez, Ai Koyanagi, Lee Smith, Dong Keon Yon

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPhysical Education and Sport Sciences Department, University of LimerickNational Research Foundation of KoreaMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningCentral South University
KeywordsOsteoarthritisMeta-analysisMedicineSystematic reviewTherapeutic ultrasoundPhonophoresisUltrasoundPhysical therapyMEDLINEInternal medicineAlternative medicineRadiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Therapeutic ultrasound (US) is a treatment for knee osteoarthritis (KOA), but its efficacy and safety are unclear. The objective of this study is to quantify the effect of US on pain relief and function recovery in KOA, and to analyze the US treatment duration and parameters on treatment outcome. Methods We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane databases and ClinicalTrials.gov databases up to 7 April 2023. RCTs that compared the efficacy of therapeutic US with the control in KOA were included in the study, and the methodological quality of the trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results Twenty-one RCTs (1315 patients) were included. US had a positive effect on visual analog scale (VAS) (SMD = -0.64, 95% CI [-0.88, -0.40], I 2 = 71%) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) total scale (SMD = -0.45, 95% CI [-0.69, -0.20]; I 2 = 67%) . Pulsed US with an intensity ≤2.5 W/cm 2 reduced visual analog scale (VAS), and differed in sessions (24 sessions (SMD = -0.80, 95% CI [-1.07, -0.53], I 2 = 0%) vs 10 sessions (SMD = -0.71, 95% CI [-1.09, -0.33], I 2 = 68%)). For pulsed US, a duration of treatment of 4-8 weeks (SMD = -0.69, 95% CI [-1.13, -0.25], I 2 = 73%) appeared to be superior to ≤4 weeks (SMD = -0.77, 95% CI [-1.04, -0.49], I 2 = 0%) for reducing visual analog scale (VAS). No US treatment-related adverse events were reported. Conclusion Therapeutic US may be a safe and effective treatment for patients with KOA. The mode, intensity, frequency, and duration of US may affect the effectiveness of pain relief. Pulsed US with an intensity ≤ 2.5 W/cm 2 , 24 sessions, and a treatment duration of ≤ 4 weeks appears to have better pain relief.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeliyonSame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207