Expression of genes related to ileal barrier function in heritage and modern broiler chickens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. An experiment was conducted to determine differences in the expression of genes encoding intestinal barrier proteins between fast, medium and slow-growing chickens. Chicken breeds Athens Canadian Random Bred (ACRB), Longenecker’s Heritage (LHR), RedBro, Hubbard H1 (HH1), Cobb500 and Ross708 were raised from hatch for 35 d.2. Ileal samples were collected at embryonic day E19 (−2 days post-hatch), hatch and d 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35 post-hatch to assess the expression of genes encoding tight junction proteins (claudins, CLDN; occludin, OCLN; zonula occludens, ZO; and junctional adhesion molecules, JAM), mucin (Muc2), immunoglobulin A (IgA), polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (pIgR) and fatty acid binding protein (FABP2).3. Expression of CLDN-1 was increased (p < 0.0001) in LHR compared to Cobb500 while CLDN-5 was increased (p < 0.0001) in ACRB, HH1, RedBro and Ross708 compared to LHR as well as in ACRB compared to Cob500. Occludin was upregulated (p = 0.01) in ACRB and LHR compared to Ross708 at d 14 post-hatch. Expression of ZO-1 was upregulated (p = 0.001) in LHR compared to Ross708, HH1 and Cobb500. Tight junction genes, except CLDN-4, JAM-2 and JAM-3 were downregulated (p < 0.0001) at hatch and d 7 post-hatch. Expression of Muc2 was increased (p < 0.0001) in LHR compared to RedBro and from −2 d to d 7 post-hatch.4. Immunoglobulin A was increased (p = 0.001) in LHR compared to Ross708 and HH1 at −2 d post-hatch and in LHR compared to ACRB, Cobb500 and Ross708 at hatch. In addition, IgA expression was increased in all breeds at d 14 post-hatch while pIgR was upregulated (p = 0.02) in Cobb500 and Ross708 compared to ACRB, HH1, LHR and RedBro at hatch.5. The gene expression patterns suggest that selection for growth may have not induced changes in junctional complexes and immune defence genes. However, the results confirmed that the expression of these genes is age dependent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".