MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396752070 · doi:10.21608/mjle.2024.353683

Motifs de Refus de L'execution de la Sentence Interne(Étude Comparée Franco-Égyptienne)

2024· article· ar· W4396752070 on OpenAlexaff
Prof. Dr. Talaat youssef khater

Bibliographic record

Venueمجلة البحوث القانونية والإقتصادية (المنصورة) · 2024
Typearticle
Languagear
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsMontreal Police Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePhysicsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’arbitrage est actuellement un mode essentiel de règlement des différends dans les rapports contractuels entre particuliers ainsi qu’entre organes des États. L’exécution de la sentence arbitrale constitue une phase très importante pour l’efficacité de l’arbitrage qui est un moyen volontaire et rapide. La sentence arbitrale, avant l’ordonnance d’exequatur, n’est qu’une simple décision, rendue par une personne privée, qui ne possède pas l’imperium. Ainsi, la sentence arbitrale n’est pas d’office exécutoire. Lorsque les parties refusent l’exécution volontaire. Cette exécution est assujettie à l’ordonnance d’exequatur. Le juge de l’exequatur doit refuser l’exequatur s’il estime que sont absents les éléments contraires à l’exécution de la sentence interne, comme la violation flagrante de l’ordre public interne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueمجلة البحوث القانونية والإقتصادية (المنصورة)Same topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207