Chapter 7: Concluding observations on the institutional perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chapter 1: Setting the Scene A. The conceptual framework I.The plurality of sources and the architecture of public international law 1.The General Law of Treaties a. Different codification approaches b.The rules of treaty interpretation and their relationship with customary international law 2.The law of international responsibility II.Traditional approaches to the relationship of sources 1.The relationship between sources 2. The relationship between the norms of different sources 3.The relationship between formal sources and material sources III.The Politics as to the sources: Source preferences in the international community 1. Source preferences and the spirit of the time 2. Source preferences and the changed composition of the legal community 3. Source preferences and the substantive expansion and diversification of international law IV.The Concept of interrelationship of sources and the scope of this study 1.The interrelationship of sources 2. Benefits of a focus on the interrelationship of sources in international practice 3. Contribution of an analysis of the interrelationship of sources to the doctrine relating to each source a. Customary international law
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".