A disaggregated integer L-shaped method for stochastic vehicle routing problems with monotonic recourse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a new integer L-shaped method for solving two-stage stochastic integer programs whose first-stage solutions can decompose into disjoint components, each one having a monotonic recourse function. In a minimization problem, the monotonicity property stipulates that the recourse cost of a component must always be higher or equal to that of any of its subcomponents. The method exploits new types of optimality cuts and lower bounding functionals that are valid under this property. The stochastic vehicle routing problem is particularly well suited to be solved by this approach, as its solutions can be decomposed into a set of routes. We consider the variant with stochastic demands in which the recourse policy consists of performing a return trip to the depot whenever a vehicle does not have sufficient capacity to accommodate a newly realized customer demand. This work shows that this policy can lead to a non-monotonic recourse function, but that the monotonicity holds when the customer demands are modeled by several commonly used families of probability distributions. We also present new problem-specific lower bounds on the recourse that strengthen the lower bounding functionals and significantly speed up the solving process. Computational experiments on instances from the literature show that the new approach achieves state-of-the-art results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".